The Cody Word
  • November 9, 2009 01:46 PM EST by Cody Willard

    Verizon to get iPhone for Xmas 2010

    A report from research outfit OTR today says that Apple's quietly, finally, contracted out assembly for a Verizon-compatible iPhone that they say is likely to hit in the second half of next year. They're likely dead on.

    When I used to run a tech-centric hedge fund, I read every OTR report that came across my desk, as they deliver objective data and information and quotes from their sources, which run deep into the technology world, but doesn't include that illegal insider information stuff that the SEC is rightly cracking down with their Galleon charges and what not. Yeah, despite the SEC finally getting in gear and going after clear examples of insider trading in which the players themselves were actively sneaking around trying to avoid putting off any scents of their misdeeds, not all information is illegal. Indeed, calling around to talk to company's sales people about how their individual sales goals are trending and visiting suppliers to your company and reading every report you can get your hands on about your company and its industry is both legal and important if you're going to be a money manager full time.

    And when you take a step back and look at what the information and marketplace are telling you, it's pretty clear that AT&T's going to lose its exclusivity contract with Apple for the iPhone sooner rather than later.

    Here's five reasons why you'll be able to buy an Apple iPhone from Verizon for Christmas 2010:

    1. AT&T's horrible network coverage is hurting Apple's brand. I have an AT&T Blackberry Curve that Fox Business gave me and I can tell you that I don't even bother to use it as a phone EVER since I also have a Verizon Blackberry Curve that actually works when I try to call people on it. The AT&T network does provide crystal clear coverage on top of our mountain ranch land in NM where the cows outpopulate the people. Not sure why that's good for Apple's brand though, considering I can't even take a call from inside my downtown NYC apartment on AT&T's network.

    2. Apple wants the iPhone to become as de facto a standard as iTunes has, and in order to do that, the iPhone needs to be carrier-neutral. When a company's products become de facto standards, you get the wild economies of scale that drive huge margins like you see in, say, Microsoft's Windows business, which is clearly a de facto standard even to this day, and which results in 99% gross margins. Apple's iPhone won't ever have gross margins of 99% since its hardware and not the zero-cost reproduction costs of software, but guess what does have 99% gross margins for Apple. Yup, all the software and apps that run on the iPhone. Give away the razors, charge for the blades.

    3. Apple needs network distribution diversification. That is, they need to bet on other technologies than AT&T's GSM-based technology. It was brilliant to start with GSM and AT&T as most of the rest of the developed world's wireless networks are built on GSM-based standards and therefore the iPhone that Apple started with was able to be instantly rolled out to other countries without much if any hardware or sourcing differences. That economy of scale thing again worked here. But now Apple can and will gain bigger economies of scale by bringing out an iPhone that will work on any network, including CDMA-based networks like Verizon's. Oh, and LTE, the next generation of wireless broadband that Verizon will be buildilng on top of its CDMA-based network is going to further the distance between AT&T's shoddy network and Verizon's best of show network.

    4. Qualcomm's got new chips rolling out that make it easy for Apple to tweak the components of the iPhone so that a CDMA-based and GSM-based iPhones would be almost interchangeable. Economies of scale gained by improved technology. Again.

    And here's a surprising "Flip It" idea for you:

    5. AT&T has been subsidizing, straight out of their cash flow, and at current prices that's probably costing them somewhere between $200 to $500 per iPhone in order to be able to offer the phone at the price points it does here in the U.S. AT&T pays Apple billions to keep that iPhone exclusive. That iPhone subsidy's probably double what Verizon and AT&T and the other carriers subsidize to the other hand set vendors like Blackberry. In that sense, now that AT&T's got a huge iPhone army in place, if they can keep their churn to low levels, it's likely the company can actually see its cash flow, EBITDA and earnings numbers expand in part because they'd be cutting back on the subsidies and payouts to Apple.

    And so how do you trade off all this analysis. Apple's continuing to position itself to see its margins and earnings expand for years as they become ever more reliant on higher margin apps and software because of the success they're having in making their lower-margin hardware the de facto standards today. Stick with Apple, though I still think there'll be another opportunity to buy it at lower levels than its $200 print here as the stock markets get extended here again. Technicians might tell you there's some resistance above $200 for Apple too.

    And as for Verizon and AT&T, I remain very concerned about the outsized debt loads they each carry. They've each borrowed tens of billions of dollars to roll out their networks and now they each have billions of dollars of debt coming due in the next few years. Cash flow at each company is great and more than covers their dividends and expenditures lately, but that debt sure's got me worried.

    Owning stocks like Apple with tens of billions of dollars of cash and no debt sure helps me rest easier than hoping stocks like AT&T and Verizon don't run into any financial problems. Remember when the auto companies like GM and Ford used to tell you that borrowing tens of billions of dollars wouldn't be any big deal. It was. That debt's gonna matter at AT&T and Verizon someday too. Those yields on their stocks, which are paying 3 times treasuries will pay you to wait. But the upside's not hopeful enough at either to make me think I'd be waiting for much of anything but more worry about their debt and if that dividend is sustainable for the next five years.

    Upshot - Verizon to get iPhone for Xmas 2010. Apple has a good outlook and good balance sheet. Verizon and AT&T have decent outlooks but horrid balance sheets. Stick with Apple. Avoid Verizon and AT&T.

The Casual Observer Notes

has FoxNews banned Christmas?

November 11, 2009 at 7:52 am

ron

I could care less about the phone. Just wanted to ask why everywhere we look people are taking Christ's name out of everything. Just like the holiday tree. If we are a nation of Christians, why not use His name where it should be?

November 10, 2009 at 11:31 pm

Conrad

I'm hoping that Apple is smart enough to go with Sprint's outstanding 3G network and their new 4G network, which has already rolled out far ahead of LTE in many major U.S. cities. The upside is that Sprint plans are far cheaper than either AT&T or Verizon. The unlimited plan from Sprint is $600 a year cheaper than the same plan with AT&T. That's more than just pocket change.

November 10, 2009 at 10:44 pm

Linda

ATT is my provider, and I switched after using verizon. I don't know where this guy lives, but where I am, ATT is great and Verizon is worthless.

November 10, 2009 at 9:47 pm

Gomes

I've worked for Verizon & AT&T and by far Verizon is the worst company of all. While working at VZW as a customer rep I received lots of calls from customers who were having dropped calls and no reception especially out West. In KY a friend had to switch services because VZW didn't have any network there. AT&T has been supporting the data for the iPhone and it's been just fine. I have yet to have problems with my phone or the network. We have to wait and see what happens. This is all talk.

November 10, 2009 at 7:17 pm

Bob

Interesting, considering how Verizon has basically slammed the iPhone in several ads. And their LTE plans are a ways off, where as AT&T is rolling out 7.2mbps HSPA right now. Verizon also doubled their ridiculous termination fee, and have already started hosing Droid users with expensive data plans. This "iphone on Verizon" trash is also just a rumor...hopefully one that remains false. T-Mobile is a more likely second US carrier anyway.

November 10, 2009 at 5:56 pm

Jesse

I will believe this when I see it, the iphone on the Verizon network rumor has been around for a long time, So keep dreaming Verizon users.

November 10, 2009 at 5:00 pm

dave

In my experience, Apple's customer support is stellar. AT&T, on the other hand is just about as bad as it can be. I buy almost every darn product apple comes out with as soon as it comes out (Ya, I'm a macbook guy), but I've not bought the new Iphone simply because of AT&T, and I gotta tell ya, I might just switch to a blackberry next because of all the network issues, the bad customer support.

November 10, 2009 at 4:57 pm

Robert Curtis

Got to give it to Apple for being able to sell useless apps at a premium. I still scratch my head wondering how many people regret buying an iPhone. (I am one)

November 10, 2009 at 4:55 pm

Dionisio

what about MOT's Droid stuff?

November 10, 2009 at 4:37 pm

Bob

How can you write such an article without mentioning Verizon's droid announcement? I have a hard time believing that Verizon went to all this trouble if an iPhone is waiting in the wings.

November 10, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Derek

I would really like to see the phones come unlocked and be carrier neutral. I think this would also put the focus back on level of service. Both in coverage, reception, not dropping calls, speed, and off course customer service. I suppose Apple makes out from taking in money for exclusive rights from ATT. Time for free market though here. The best service and the best phones will win out when things open up. Just my two cents.

November 10, 2009 at 1:45 pm

Derek

What would be really nice is if handsets all came unlocked in the US. www.thetradesurfer.com

November 10, 2009 at 10:50 am

Corey in GA

Sucks on the phone. My AT&T phone is definitely not as functional as my Verizon was, but the price point is better and my Atlanta reception is good if not great as with Verizon. I had HORRIBLE reception for a week or two then realized my phone was defective. New phone and 95% of Verizon coverage (again, in MY area) for a bit less. Still neutral on who is better. I'll look at Apple for investment. I am still the cheap type of guy for technology. I can't justify $90/month for any phone plan.

November 10, 2009 at 8:37 am

charles Boyd

While you guys were set on the Health Bill, Congress and the Senate passed and review the new HR2454 Clean Energy Gill. Which will cost the average family $16,830 annually, not including the What the Government Health Plan will cost, and you can expect the new HR2454 will cost the average small business$34,690 annually. I guess I'm just a dumb American, according to those in office. C Boyd 760-962-8528 an democrat

November 9, 2009 at 7:58 pm

about this blog

  • Cody Willard is an anchor on the FOX Business Network. Willard is also the principal of an investment management company. He was a long-time featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com as well as a regular featured economist and stock picker on CNBC's ''Kudlow & Company."