The Cody Word
  • November 5, 2009 01:35 PM EST by Cody Willard

    The one bubble I see for sure: The Money Supply Bubble

    Are we in an "everything bubble"?  That is, are the recent huge rallies in gold, stocks, and most other asset classes in the world mostly mostly attributable to the type of blow-off top action you get when bubbles start to pop?

    I don’t know how many bubbles we’re living in right now, or even if we’ve even entered truly bubblicious territory or if we’re just on the way to bubble creating everywhere.  I do know this – the Fed/Treasury/White House/Congress have created a bubble in the money supply in this country.  Here, look what the Fed/Treasury/White House/Congress are doing to the money supply:

    How much of the action in the markets are simply a function of this explosion in the money supply causing bubbles? gold's hitting new highs like every other minute.  Oil's almost tripled since it crashed to $30 a barrel.  Copper, silver and a lot of other commodities are higher than they've been in a long time. The stock markets are up 50% across the board since they crashed last year. Housing's still dropping, but it's not exactly in the free fall it was in 2007 and 2008.

    Even scarier – if the artificially low 2-3% Fed Funds rates and no-doc jumbo subprime macchiato loans from the last ten years caused the great housing bubble, and if the artificially low 2-3% Fed Funds rates caused the great dot com bubble….aren’t those bubbles going to look like tiny air pockets when we get done with whatever bubbles are caused by the current 0% Fed Funds rates, $8,000 welfare checks for home buyers, FHA loans, trillion dollar TARP bailout cash infusions, $12 trillion in lending and corporate debt guarantees and all the other crap that’s not even being measured in that terrifying money supply bubble chart I posted above.

    The dollar's down 20% plus from where it was last year...when everything changed and the Fed/Treasury/White House/Congress decided that we had to avoid asset depreciation at any cost to the responsible saver.  Not sure why I should be happy about that…remember how everybody told us in 2007 that a weak dollar would be good for the exporters and perhaps therefore the country’s economy? Back before we crashed that is.

    We’ll hear the Fed/Treasury/White House/Congress explain their trashing of our savings and earnings by saying that they’re trying to stave off “deflation”. Don’t believe ‘em. It's important to remember the distinction between depreciation and deflation.  Depreciation is what happens to your assets when they lose value.  Deflation is what happens to the price of stuff you buy at the grocery store and at the movie theater when they get cheaper.  Have you seen that happen ever in your lifetime?  Have you seen the price of anything at your grocery or at the movie theater get cheaper in the last year or two?  I didn't think so.  We were experiencing a major asset depreciation cycle before the Fed/Treasury/White House/Congress decided they needed to sacrifice the value of everybody's savings and salaries by printing/borrowing and otherwise flooding our economy with worthless dollars that haven't been earned by anybody.

    Put another way – no matter what happens to housing’s prices or the stock markets, do you really think the 99 cent store’s going to have more items for sale at 99 cents five years from today than it does today? I don’t. The DJIA might be at 6000 in five years, housing might be down another 10-20% across the country…but I don’t think the shoppers at the 99 cent store will experience much “deflation” in the next five years.

    And I do think we’ll see a lot of strange asset appreciation turning into horrific and painful bubbles in the next five years…assuming the stock market is actually a part of that bubble – let’s picture the DJIA bubbling up to new highs and hitting 15,000….what’s the end game of that? Another bubble popping? More pain from trillions of misallocated capital.

    Likewise I might ask as a parting shot here, what’s the endgame of the $8,000 welfare check, er housing credit for people rich enough to buy new homes? What’s the end game of the nationalizing the country’s mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? What’s the endgame of all these policies aimed at redistributing enough wealth into real estate so that the people who currently own real estate don’t lose their butts even though they were supposedly risking their own and their banker’s money on that real estate?

    These bubbles, here now or here tomorrow, will eventually pop and we’ll all be worse off from them.

    Best way to protect yourself? Bet on higher rates, as all this bubble making is sure to create demand for higher returns. When I used to run money, I’d sometimes buy calls on the TNX, which mimics the yield on the 10 year. Careful though, there’s not a lot of volume and the spreads are wide on those instruments. TIPS aren’t a bad bet either. I’d remain careful about gold though, as everybody I know remains bullish on that commodity and remains convinced its safe haven, despite the possibility of asset depreciation hitting, yes, even gold.

    Get more stock picking analysis at http://revolutionewsletter.com.

    Follow me at http://twitter.com/codywillard

William denham

Anybody want to talk about how Printing fiat money in excess leads to inflation, poverty and class warfare? Printing excess fiat currency has lead to massive inflation, class warfare and revolution in places like Russia China and Argentina.Inflation has been called an insidious tax because of the unfair burden it places on the children the poor the old and any body depending on a fixed income, They get hammered when the value of their money falls.I call it theift.

November 6, 2009 at 4:14 pm

Tim Roberts

This is without a doubt, the single most poorly written article I have ever read on finance. I like you Cody, but you can do a helluva lot better than this drivel.

November 6, 2009 at 6:42 am

tom c

Dead on! With high inflation coming. As soon as the government states/starts to "unwind" fasten your seatbelt. Continue your great commentary.

November 5, 2009 at 11:08 pm

Leonard C. Tekaat

Homebuyer Tax Credits VS. Stimulus Mortgage Which one is better for the economy? Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax. Lower mortgage interest rates on the other hand would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize the mortgages could be sold to cover the cost to the US Treasury. www.economysflaw.wordpress.com

November 5, 2009 at 10:20 pm

Leonard C. Tekaat

Homebuyer tax credits vs. lower mortgage interest rates. Which are better for the economy. Lower mortgage interest rates would be better for our economy than tax credits. Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax. Lower mortgage interest rates on the other hand funded by the Treasury would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize and the economy improves, the mortgages can be sold. The Fed will do this with all the mortgage-backed securities that they have bought in the last year. The problem is that the mortgages that are currently being offered to the public has an interest rate that is too high to sufficiently increase consumers purchasing power to stimulate the economy. The unemployment and foreclosures rate continue to rise. With a spread of 475 basis points between the fed rate and a 30yr fixed rate mortgage rate the only entity whose financial condition is improving is the banking industry. All money is returned to the banking industry. If the money were lent to the people at a lower rate of interest, it would help the banks and the economy. With the economy faltering because of a lack of consumer and investor confidence a stimulus is needed to include the consumer in the economic recovery.

November 5, 2009 at 9:16 pm

Ron Cave

Cody, I enjoy your tirades, but when are you going to have a print button on your blog so we can share it with others??

November 5, 2009 at 5:45 pm

rightisright

Holy Crap! I've never seen that graphic! Running for the hills!

November 5, 2009 at 4:43 pm

John Campbell

How about an energy fund such as VGENX (Vanguard Energy)? Would Silver be safer than gold since it has ran up as fast?

November 5, 2009 at 4:05 pm

about this blog

  • Cody Willard is an anchor on the FOX Business Network. Willard is also the principal of an investment management company. He was a long-time featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com as well as a regular featured economist and stock picker on CNBC's ''Kudlow & Company."

most popular posts