about this blog
- Cody Willard is an anchor on the FOX Business Network. Willard is also the principal of an investment management company.
He was a long-time featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com as well as a regular featured economist and stock picker on CNBC's ''Kudlow & Company."
most popular posts
-
- There are no viewed posts at this time.
William denham
Anybody want to talk about how Printing fiat money in excess leads to inflation, poverty and class warfare? Printing excess fiat currency has lead to massive inflation, class warfare and revolution in places like Russia China and Argentina.Inflation has been called an insidious tax because of the unfair burden it places on the children the poor the old and any body depending on a fixed income, They get hammered when the value of their money falls.I call it theift.
Tim Roberts
This is without a doubt, the single most poorly written article I have ever read on finance. I like you Cody, but you can do a helluva lot better than this drivel.
tom c
Dead on! With high inflation coming. As soon as the government states/starts to "unwind" fasten your seatbelt. Continue your great commentary.
Leonard C. Tekaat
Homebuyer Tax Credits VS. Stimulus Mortgage Which one is better for the economy? Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax. Lower mortgage interest rates on the other hand would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize the mortgages could be sold to cover the cost to the US Treasury. www.economysflaw.wordpress.com
Leonard C. Tekaat
Homebuyer tax credits vs. lower mortgage interest rates. Which are better for the economy. Lower mortgage interest rates would be better for our economy than tax credits. Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax. Lower mortgage interest rates on the other hand funded by the Treasury would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize and the economy improves, the mortgages can be sold. The Fed will do this with all the mortgage-backed securities that they have bought in the last year. The problem is that the mortgages that are currently being offered to the public has an interest rate that is too high to sufficiently increase consumers purchasing power to stimulate the economy. The unemployment and foreclosures rate continue to rise. With a spread of 475 basis points between the fed rate and a 30yr fixed rate mortgage rate the only entity whose financial condition is improving is the banking industry. All money is returned to the banking industry. If the money were lent to the people at a lower rate of interest, it would help the banks and the economy. With the economy faltering because of a lack of consumer and investor confidence a stimulus is needed to include the consumer in the economic recovery.
Ron Cave
Cody, I enjoy your tirades, but when are you going to have a print button on your blog so we can share it with others??
rightisright
Holy Crap! I've never seen that graphic! Running for the hills!
John Campbell
How about an energy fund such as VGENX (Vanguard Energy)? Would Silver be safer than gold since it has ran up as fast?