<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackrock uses welfare and terrorist funds to acquire Blackrock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/06/23/blackrock-uses-welfare-and-terrorist-funds-to-acquire-blackrock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/06/23/blackrock-uses-welfare-and-terrorist-funds-to-acquire-blackrock/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:19:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JRN</title>
		<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/06/23/blackrock-uses-welfare-and-terrorist-funds-to-acquire-blackrock/comment-page-1/#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator>JRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=815#comment-5443</guid>
		<description>Not sure I understand how your headline isn&#039;t libelous, let along nonsensical.  You&#039;re either cravenly trying to attract populist buzz or the most ignorant person with access to a computer since KoKo the chimp passed away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I understand how your headline isn&#8217;t libelous, let along nonsensical.  You&#8217;re either cravenly trying to attract populist buzz or the most ignorant person with access to a computer since KoKo the chimp passed away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/06/23/blackrock-uses-welfare-and-terrorist-funds-to-acquire-blackrock/comment-page-1/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=815#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>Cody, clearly you have no understanding of how either economics or law work. Why should PNC and B o A sell their best performing asset at ridiculously low prices? The taxpayer will be considerbaly better served as the markets recover and and the revenue from BlackRock goes straight to these firms and then the taxpayer. Probably worth noting that the charipeople you noted have committed no legal fraud and obviously cannot be sent to jail for &quot;gross incompetence&quot;. Totally pointless and badly informed article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cody, clearly you have no understanding of how either economics or law work. Why should PNC and B o A sell their best performing asset at ridiculously low prices? The taxpayer will be considerbaly better served as the markets recover and and the revenue from BlackRock goes straight to these firms and then the taxpayer. Probably worth noting that the charipeople you noted have committed no legal fraud and obviously cannot be sent to jail for &#8220;gross incompetence&#8221;. Totally pointless and badly informed article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moving</title>
		<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/06/23/blackrock-uses-welfare-and-terrorist-funds-to-acquire-blackrock/comment-page-1/#comment-5433</link>
		<dc:creator>moving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=815#comment-5433</guid>
		<description>Cody-

It seems clear to me that none of what has been done with TARP or various bail outs was done to &quot;solve the problem&quot;.  Unless you except the premise that what was being done by the fed, treasury, Bush, and Obama, is less about fixing and more about protecting and controlling the largest banks and financial institutions you will drive your self crazy trying to understand the logic of what has been and is being done.

The first thing that should have happened to these to big to fail organizations was to break them up and make them into smaller more focused less bloated...instead we took a handful of very large financial institutions who were in trouble or on the verge of being in trouble and gov&#039;t officials forced them to merge or be &quot;bought out&quot;.  So we go from a having many &quot;too big to fail&quot; institutions that might possibly be able to fail to fewer even larger institutions that are less likely to be able to fail with out destroying our economy in the process.  We are going from bad to worse.  The next financial meltdown (assuming we make it through this one) will be even worse because of the current actions taken to &quot;resolve&quot; the current hard times. For many reasons we need more smaller financial institutions not fewer larger &quot;stronger&quot; institutions to truly make our financial system stronger and less likely to suffer financial meltdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cody-</p>
<p>It seems clear to me that none of what has been done with TARP or various bail outs was done to &#8220;solve the problem&#8221;.  Unless you except the premise that what was being done by the fed, treasury, Bush, and Obama, is less about fixing and more about protecting and controlling the largest banks and financial institutions you will drive your self crazy trying to understand the logic of what has been and is being done.</p>
<p>The first thing that should have happened to these to big to fail organizations was to break them up and make them into smaller more focused less bloated&#8230;instead we took a handful of very large financial institutions who were in trouble or on the verge of being in trouble and gov&#8217;t officials forced them to merge or be &#8220;bought out&#8221;.  So we go from a having many &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; institutions that might possibly be able to fail to fewer even larger institutions that are less likely to be able to fail with out destroying our economy in the process.  We are going from bad to worse.  The next financial meltdown (assuming we make it through this one) will be even worse because of the current actions taken to &#8220;resolve&#8221; the current hard times. For many reasons we need more smaller financial institutions not fewer larger &#8220;stronger&#8221; institutions to truly make our financial system stronger and less likely to suffer financial meltdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>