The Cody Word
  • June 23, 2009 11:46 AM EDT by Cody Willard

    Blackrock uses welfare and terrorist funds to acquire Blackrock

    So the Republican Democrat Regime in power and the regulators and bureaucrats they've appointed think that enabling Blackrock to become the largest wealth manager in the world, with some $2.8 trillion in assets is a good idea.  Here's a few reasons why the Department of Justice or the Supreme Court or anybody else with some power to do something about this merger should stop it in its tracks.

    1. $2.8 billion of funding that Larry Fink from Blackrock raised to get this deal done came in large part from sovereign wealth funds which is money that corrupt governments around the world use to enable their ruling elite to lead lives of debauchery while their citizens are oppressed with little individual rights.  I've also argued that sovereign wealth funds are where terrorists get their money.

    2. PNC financial also ponied up a big chunk of that $2.8 billion in funding that enabled Fink to get this deal done -- PNC is on welfare in order to make its payroll.  Without taxpayer largesse from the TARP bailouts, PNC would be insolvent.  Why are they risking taxpayer money for their own potential profit in this merger rather than getting the taxpayer his money back RIGHT NOW?

    3. And on a similar note, Bank of America has taken in tens of billions of dollars from TARP and then was so insolvent even with that money on their balance sheet that Ken Lewis has had to come begging for more welfare money to keep the company's lights on.  They own nearly 40% of Blackrock and that RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW is worth several billion dollars.  I asked when this deal was first announced - shouldn't BofA be forced to sell that piece off and use the proceeds to get the taxpayer her money back RIGHT NOW and not take a chance that Blackrock blows up like it surely will at some point?

    4.  By allowing a giant money manager to take over another giant money manager, both of which have been taking over yet other money management firms, are we setting ourselves up for another "too big to fail" scenario?  Isn't this merger akin to allowing Citigroup to buy Travelers and Bank of America to acquire competitors to become what the same Republican Democrat Regime in power eventually declared "too big to fail".

    5. Let me repeat -- Blackrock is using taxpayer largesse from PNC financial (money that could be going to pay for teachers, healthcare for children, or foodstamps)  to give to a European bank in order to create a money management firm here that will be too big to fail and result in even less competition and diversification of risk in the economy.

    My take? Instead of pretending to do something about the mess this economy and the financial markets themselves are in by creating some "new regulations" -- I ask once again:

    1. How about we enforce the laws already on the books designed to protect the system?

    2. How about we stop giving welfare funds to the shareholders and managements of banks which would otherwise be insolvent enabling them to risk taxpayer money for their own profit?

    3. How about we fire the regulators and vote out the representatives who were in charge of making sure that the banks weren't taking excess risks with our deposits during good times so that the banks and their shareholders and certainly their depositors wouldn't have to beg for taxpayer largesse just to stay in business within the first couple years of what was an inevitable real estate downturn?

    4. How about we prosecute managements and executives at Bank of America and Citigroup and AIG and send them to prison for either fraud or gross incompetence since they repeatedly told investors and regulators and customers that they're balance sheets were healthy when they clearly weren't?

    5. How about we prosecute anybody who was in the closed door TARP meetings, including Jamie Dimon from JP Morgan, Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner from the Feds, Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman, and EVERYBODY else there for RICO violations?  For collusion?  They have extorted trillions of dollars from the taxpayer with all these bailout programs for their shareholders and if we actually got our hands on transcripts and documents from their discussions from these bailouts, I guarantee we'd find lots of fraud and collusion to commit such crimes and others.

moving

Cody- It seems clear to me that none of what has been done with TARP or various bail outs was done to "solve the problem". Unless you except the premise that what was being done by the fed, treasury, Bush, and Obama, is less about fixing and more about protecting and controlling the largest banks and financial institutions you will drive your self crazy trying to understand the logic of what has been and is being done. The first thing that should have happened to these to big to fail organizations was to break them up and make them into smaller more focused less bloated...instead we took a handful of very large financial institutions who were in trouble or on the verge of being in trouble and gov't officials forced them to merge or be "bought out". So we go from a having many "too big to fail" institutions that might possibly be able to fail to fewer even larger institutions that are less likely to be able to fail with out destroying our economy in the process. We are going from bad to worse. The next financial meltdown (assuming we make it through this one) will be even worse because of the current actions taken to "resolve" the current hard times. For many reasons we need more smaller financial institutions not fewer larger "stronger" institutions to truly make our financial system stronger and less likely to suffer financial meltdown.

June 23, 2009 at 2:33 pm

RS

Cody, clearly you have no understanding of how either economics or law work. Why should PNC and B o A sell their best performing asset at ridiculously low prices? The taxpayer will be considerbaly better served as the markets recover and and the revenue from BlackRock goes straight to these firms and then the taxpayer. Probably worth noting that the charipeople you noted have committed no legal fraud and obviously cannot be sent to jail for "gross incompetence". Totally pointless and badly informed article.

June 24, 2009 at 5:56 am

JRN

Not sure I understand how your headline isn't libelous, let along nonsensical. You're either cravenly trying to attract populist buzz or the most ignorant person with access to a computer since KoKo the chimp passed away

June 25, 2009 at 3:06 pm

about this blog

  • Cody Willard is an anchor on the FOX Business Network. Willard is also the principal of an investment management company. He was a long-time featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com as well as a regular featured economist and stock picker on CNBC's ''Kudlow & Company."

most popular posts