<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watching the Watcher Watch the Watchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/08/18/watching-the-watcher-watch-the-watchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/08/18/watching-the-watcher-watch-the-watchers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:19:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rmfretz</title>
		<link>http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/08/18/watching-the-watcher-watch-the-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>rmfretz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cody.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=357#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>I follow Rep. Garrett pretty closely and I seriously can&#039;t believe you posted this thing.  He&#039;s been a regular on your show and Fox Biz as it is, and since we&#039;re in the NY market with such outsized personalities like Schumer hogging the local news coverage, these are rare chances for us to see Garrett&#039;s insights. He&#039;s kept coming back even though you guys have gotten his positions wrong in your introductions, forcing him to waste the air time correcting you.  

Now you&#039;ve gone and posted what appears to have been intended to be a private e-mail from his press sec.  Granted, it was gushing and probably made you feel good.  Did you get the okay for this, or did you just decide the e-mail was automatically on the record?  

I criticize Garrett for a lot, but I wouldn&#039;t blame him for not coming on your show again if you didn&#039;t get the green light.  There&#039;s a certain amount of courtesy you should clearly exhibit, and without some disclaimer showing you got the green light to post this, one has to believe you don&#039;t have said professional courtesy.  I sincerely hope you haven&#039;t just cost my District one of the few chances we get to see our guy explain what he thinks, whether or not we agree with what he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow Rep. Garrett pretty closely and I seriously can&#8217;t believe you posted this thing.  He&#8217;s been a regular on your show and Fox Biz as it is, and since we&#8217;re in the NY market with such outsized personalities like Schumer hogging the local news coverage, these are rare chances for us to see Garrett&#8217;s insights. He&#8217;s kept coming back even though you guys have gotten his positions wrong in your introductions, forcing him to waste the air time correcting you.  </p>
<p>Now you&#8217;ve gone and posted what appears to have been intended to be a private e-mail from his press sec.  Granted, it was gushing and probably made you feel good.  Did you get the okay for this, or did you just decide the e-mail was automatically on the record?  </p>
<p>I criticize Garrett for a lot, but I wouldn&#8217;t blame him for not coming on your show again if you didn&#8217;t get the green light.  There&#8217;s a certain amount of courtesy you should clearly exhibit, and without some disclaimer showing you got the green light to post this, one has to believe you don&#8217;t have said professional courtesy.  I sincerely hope you haven&#8217;t just cost my District one of the few chances we get to see our guy explain what he thinks, whether or not we agree with what he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>