The Cody Word
  • July 28, 2008 11:31 AM EDT by Cody Willard

    Energy in 2008 is Telecom in 2000

    Long time readers of mine know that I rail against charting as an trading too.  Money management tool, ok, maybe but put simply, I don't think capitalism is designed to reward people for drawing lines on stock charts over time.  Making money is never that easy.

    But that's not to say that charts don't have their value.  Let's run through some energy- and oil-related charts:

    Oil Demand from China:

    -

    To the moon, I tell ya.  How about the price of oil:

    -

    And oil stocks, wonder what they've been doing in this environment:

    -

    Yup, all those charts are straight up for the last few years.  My question is why do investors and analysts take those charts and extrapolate an endless future of straight up for what has been a very cyclical industry for the full 150 years it's been around.

    Oh,  I hear ya -- it's different this time in the 21st century.  Demand growth from China and India have changed the equation of supply and demand forever.  Or not.

    I heard the same arguments about how the demand for broadband and new services had changed things forever in the telecom industry back a decade ago.  When investors and analysts took those straight up charts for anything related to telecom and extrapolated those trends out to forever.  An endless future of straight up...or so they hoped at the time.  Let's review a few of those charts from telecom's hey day when people who questioned the endless boom were tarred and feathered as idiots...you know, sorta like those of us who question the endless energy boom of today:

    And the Internet's share of "music channels" (which begs the question if anybody even knows what a "music channel" is today...which begs the question of which carbon scam will be unrecognizable in five years...hopefully all of 'em and ethanol too!):

    -

    Telecom was gonna boom forever in Canada too:

    -

    And of course, we were all gonna double our Internet usage every few months into eternity:

    -

    And telecom stocks, yeah, they were gonna go higher forever:

    Except they didn't, because even though usage of the Internet continued to grow secularly and steadily, even accelerating again of late as we all consume ever more video over the Internet, there was so much supply that came on from all the capital that flowed into the industry.   The assets and value from the sunk supply that came online as the money in the industry sloshed around and put in new infrastructure, swamped even the steadily growing demand for telecom services.  And the bubble popped and anybody who thought it was different this time lost their shirt.

    I'm not saying the same thing is gonna happy in oil...wait, yes I am. I am saying the same thing that happened to the pure commodity of bandwidth will happen to the pure commodity of energy.

    All shortages are followed by gluts.  Especially in pure commodities.

BamBam

OK, but where are we going to find the additional supply of oil? Or, is your primary driver for falling prices reduced demand? I don't think oil will go straight up from here. But, it's hard to see how it would fall hard in the absence of either extra supply or substitutes. And both of those look to be a long way off.

July 28, 2008 at 3:10 pm

Dennes

Hey Cody, I'm really disappointed that you totally disregard the principle of resource scarcity! Don't you have a degree in Economics? 10 years ago, you had the majority of Chinese riding bikes to work and now they are driving SUV's. By 2020 there will be more cars in China than there are in the United States. You showed a graph of how oil increased during the past decade, but you did not show how the major oil wells in the world started to decline in oil production. Oil production will increase in the near future as a result of the current oil prices, but the majority of the new oil supplies will be coming from the Tar Sands from Canada and those producers need at least $70/bbl to break even. I'm not saying that oil will shoot to the moon, but the days of cheap oil is gone and the economies of the world are going through a readjustment from the current price shock. Besides if demand is greater than supply of a certain resource, how can one predict the price increase for that resource? Maybe oil was undervalued this entire time? Oh by the way, I enjoy your show and I'm glad that you are getting better =)

July 28, 2008 at 3:16 pm

Justin

Seriously, if you are so certain about it, why not take a massive short position? Was oil's run to $147 too fast? You bet and we've pulled back a good 15% since then. Heck, we may even pull back 33% from the peak to $100 a barrell. The time to buy oil again is when longs go through a panic sell off. When these institutional ibanks have to liquidate their holdings due to people selling oil and taking profits, it'll be time to move back in. Ibanks will probably have to liquidate their holdings anyway sooner rather than later as oil/commodities are falling and their real estate losses are mounting (and the subprime credit default swaps are looking nastier each passing day). When it comes back though, it's going to make the run to $200. The bull market in commodities lives on baby!!!

July 28, 2008 at 5:11 pm

SD

You wrote: "All shortages are followed by gluts. Especially in pure commodities." Along those lines: "The cobweb theorem memorialized the dynamic process whereby farmers increase their supply of a commodity in the year after an increase in price of the commodity, thus causing a price drop in the next year. There were four occasions where soybean prices increased by more than $1 a bushel in one year, and the average decline in price the next year was some 25%. The power of substitution, the choice that suppliers have in deploying their resources and their recovery techniques is underlined and provides a caution for those that haven't a copy of a recent economics book close at hand, or who are not anticipating a similar reductomy in oil." -- Victor Niederhoffer http://www.dailyspeculations.com/vic/cobweb.html

July 28, 2008 at 9:36 pm

David

My father was 10 when the crash of 1929 occurred. His family was dirt poor, my Grandfather was a US Marshall with a nominal salary for even that period. My father is now 89 and still mowes his own yard and he did well in his career in trucking. But my Dad would tell you oil will drop, in fact it is very possible in my life time that the internal combustion engine may very well be replaced (I love my gas hog Suburban, and big Dodge Diesel and I ain't tradeing them off any time soon). Things change. Ask my Dad just how much change he has seen in his life time, get ready for a long conversation. My Dad will tell you that the only certain thing is that things will change. New technologies are immerging, yes some of them are a long ways off. But we still have shell oil in the midwest (a reserve considered by some bigger than the middle east). Which is profitable to extract at $60 a barrel. Ask any geologist or oil man in the know and they will tell you we have no idea how much oil is in the Gulf of Mexico, far less than 30% has been explored. The only thing that can keep oil prices high, is the same thing that made them high to begin with, LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC POLICES MARRIED TO THE JUNK SCIENCE OF ENVIROMENTALISM. Want cheap oil? Vote out EVERY POLITICIAN THAT REFUSES TO VOTE YES TO DRILLING, THAT STANDS IN THE WAY OF BUILDING NEW REFINERIES, THAT FORCES BUSINESS TO ADHERE TO BAD ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES BASED ON EMOTION AND NOT SCIENCE! Make America free again, vote against liberalism in every form.

July 29, 2008 at 8:03 am

about this blog

  • Cody Willard is an anchor on the FOX Business Network. Willard is also the principal of an investment management company. He was a long-time featured columnist for the Financial Times and TheStreet.com as well as a regular featured economist and stock picker on CNBC's ''Kudlow & Company."

most popular posts